ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Integrative multidisciplinary oncological approach in cancer patients receiving oncological treatments: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) practices are increasingly utilized by cancer patients to alleviate treatment-related side effects and support immune function. Among these, mycotherapy has gained attention for its potential hematologic and immunomodulatory benefits. Methods: We report a retrospective observational case series of six cancer patients receiving standard oncologic therapy who were supplemented with a commercially available herbal preparation as part of routine integrative supportive care. Neutrophil count and patient-reported quality of life were monitored during standard clinical follow-up. Results: During supplementation, a temporal association was observed between integrative treatment and stabilization of neutrophil count, allowing continuation of anticancer therapy without further dose reductions or prolonged interruptions. No adverse events attributable to the supplement were recorded. Discussion: Although limited by its small sample size and observational design, this case series suggests that integrative mycotherapy may represent a feasible supportive approach in selected patients experiencing treatment-related hematologic toxicity. Conclusion: In this case series study, neutrophil recovery was observed with a temporal association between the herbal preparation and the outcome. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis generating. Prospective controlled studies are warranted to clarify efficacy, safety, and optimal integration strategies within standard oncology care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.