ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Comparative clinical outcomes and safety of finerenone, SGLT2 inhibitors, RAS inhibitors and ARNI in heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Calcium dysregulation in diabetic cardiomyopathy & heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although pharmacological therapies for heart failure have advanced, direct comparative evidence on the clinical outcomes and safety of finerenone versus other agents remains limited in HFpEF or HFmrEF. Objective: A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical outcomes and safety among finerenone, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF. Methods: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from database inception to 3 January 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, and a network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate cardiovascular (CV) death, worsening heart failure (HF) events, composite renal outcomes, all-cause mortality, total HF hospitalizations, and adverse events. Results: A total of 27 RCTs involving 65,929 patients were included. Compared with placebo, finerenone was associated with lower risk of CV death (OR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.95) and worsening HF events (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.79), but higher risk of composite renal outcomes (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.84). No significant differences in CV death or all-cause mortality. In indirect comparisons, finerenone was associated with lower risk of worsening HF events versus canagliflozin (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.13-3.98) and RASi (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.42). Sotagliflozin (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.74) and empagliflozin (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99) were associated with lower risk of total HF hospitalizations. Relative to finerenone, canagliflozin (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.88) and RASi (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.57) were associated with higher risk of adverse events. Conclusion: Compared with placebo, finerenone was associated with lower risk of CV death and worsening HF events. As most comparisons between interventions were indirect, sotagliflozin and empagliflozin were associated with lower risk of total HF hospitalizations relative to finerenone, whereas ARNI and empagliflozin were associated with lower risk of composite renal outcomes, and canagliflozin and RASi with higher risk of adverse events. No significant differences were observed between interventions for CV death or all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.