ArticlePsychosocial intervention2026
The Stress-Buffering Effect of Social Support on Socio-Economic Disparities in Mental Health among Cancer Survivors.
Article in Psychosocial intervention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow socio-economic status (SES) is considered a major chronic stressor and is frequently associated with worse mental health among cancer survivors. We investigated the extent to which social support could mitigate the negative impact of low SES on the mental health of individuals with a history of cancer.
methodParticipants were cancer survivors identified in two nationally representative surveys conducted in Spain in 2017 (n = 1,143) and 2023 (n = 980). SES was measured with the social class index of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology. Social support was measured with the Duke-UNC questionnaire and the Oslo Social Support Scale. Mental health outcomes included psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire-12), mental well-being (WHO-5 Index), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8). The moderating role of social support was examined in a multiple regression framework, complemented by generalized additive models to capture potential non-linear effects.
resultsMental health vulnerability was highest among individuals with low levels of social support, where no SES-related differences were observed. Under medium social support, low SES was linked to higher psychological distress (B = 0.24, 95% confidence intervals, CI [0.05, 0.42]), lower mental well-being (B = -6.08 [-1.98, -10.18]), and higher rates of depression (OR = 2.78 [1.52, 5.00]). High social support buffered this effect, improving mental health among cancer survivors with low SES and reducing SES differences. Sub-group analyses revealed that this buffering effect was less evident among women, for whom inequalities persisted regardless of social support levels. DISCUSSION: High social support consistently attenuated SES disparities across three different mental health outcomes, albeit less effectively among women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.