ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Chinese Version of the Life Change Adaptation Scale for Family Caregivers of Individuals of Stroke Survivors.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the original English version of the Life Change Adaptation Scale (LCAS) into Chinese and to examine its reliability and validity among family caregivers of stroke survivors in China. Methods: A methodological study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 involved the cross-cultural adaptation of the LCAS using Brislin's translation model, including forward and back-translation, expert review by the original author, and cultural adaptation via a Delphi expert consultation panel (n=8). A pilot test (n=20) assessed feasibility. In Phase 2, psychometric testing was performed with a convenience sample of 260 family caregivers of stroke survivors from a tertiary hospital. Participants completed the Chinese LCAS and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Internal consistency, test-retest reliability (2-week interval, n=30), content validity, construct validity (Exploratory Factor Analysis), and convergent validation were evaluated. Results: The cross-cultural adaptation process ensured semantic and conceptual equivalence. This 8-item scale is feasible for clinical use, requiring approximately 3-5 minutes to complete. The Chinese LCAS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.922). Exploratory Factor Analysis (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure = 0.716, Bartlett's test of sphericity Conclusion: The Chinese version of the LCAS is a brief, reliable, valid, and practical tool for assessing life-change adaptation among family caregivers of stroke survivors in China. It is recommended for use by clinicians and researchers to screen caregiver adaptation needs and evaluate support interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.