ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Acupuncture Therapy Combined with Core Stability Training for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a common and disabling condition without identifiable specific pathoanatomical causes. Acupuncture therapy combined with core stability training (AT+CST) are widely used nonpharmacological interventions for CNSLBP. However, the effectiveness and safety of this combined intervention remains controversial. The present study conducted a network meta-analysis to rank the efficacy of different acupuncture modalities combined with core stability training and to identify the optimal treatment strategy, with the aim of informing health policy and guiding clinical practice. Methods: Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) published from database inception to March 7, 2025, were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, WANFANG Database, and SinoMed. Manual searches and reference tracking were performed. Pairwise meta-analyses and network meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan and ADDIS software, respectively, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated. The primary outcome was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. The secondary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Safety was defined as the incidence of adverse events(AEs). Results: Thirty-two RCTs involving 2726 patients with CNSLBP were included. Available safety data suggested that reported AEs were generally mild, reversible, and infrequent; however, AE reporting was incomplete and heterogeneous across studies. Network meta-analysis indicated that moxibustion combined with unstable surface training ranked highly for reducing VAS scores, but this ranking was supported by limited evidence. Conclusion: This study suggests that AT+CST may be more effective than single interventions for CNSLBP. Moxibustion combined with unstable surface training may be the optimal strategy, with a favorable safety profile. However, given the methodological limitations and heterogeneity of the current evidence, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future high-quality, multicenter RCTs are needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.