ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in biofluids: analytical considerations and clinical relevance in neurodegenerative diseases.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many years, astrocytes were viewed mainly as supportive cells, responding passively to neuronal injury. Over the last decade, this perspective has changed substantially, and astrocytes are now shown to be highly dynamic cells that actively shape neurodegenerative processes. As a result, interest has grown in biomarkers capable of capturing astrocytic activity in vivo. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an intermediate filament protein predominantly expressed by astrocytes, is released into cerebrospinal fluid and blood during astrogliosis and can be reliably measured using ultrasensitive immunoassays. Increasing evidence indicates that GFAP levels are elevated across several neurodegenerative diseases and reflect both disease presence and severity. In Alzheimer's disease, blood GFAP rises early in the disease course, often before overt cognitive decline, and is closely associated with amyloid pathology and subsequent progression. In Lewy body dementia and Parkinson's disease, GFAP provides complementary information by reflecting astroglial activation, identifying patients with concomitant Alzheimer's pathology, and capturing disease heterogeneity. In frontotemporal dementia, GFAP levels are consistently increased and correlate with disease severity, particularly in genetic forms, although disease specificity remains limited. Beyond its diagnostic value, GFAP holds promise as a prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarker, supporting patient stratification and monitoring in clinical trials. However, its clinical interpretation requires careful consideration of analytical methods, pre-analytical conditions, age-related effects, and systemic confounders. Overall, GFAP has emerged as a valuable marker of astrocytic involvement in neurodegeneration and represents an important component of future multimodal biomarker strategies aimed at improving precision medicine in neurology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42223663What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.