Evidence mapPaperPMID 42223845Full record

ReviewInfection2026

Viral subversion of megakaryopoiesis: reshaping the landscapes of immune regulation.

J M Ananthu Chandran, A P Athira, Ravi Prakash Arya, Anismrita Lahon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J M Ananthu Chandran *Department of Viral Vaccines, Institute of Advanced Virology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
A P Athira *Department of Viral Vaccines, Institute of Advanced Virology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Ravi Prakash AryaDepartment of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India. ravi.arya82@gmail.com.
Anismrita LahonDepartment of Viral Vaccines, Institute of Advanced Virology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. anismrita.niv@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review provides a brief overview of how viruses influence megakaryocyte development, maturation, and immune responses. Understanding this crucial host-virus pathophysiology will help to mitigate adverse effects by enabling the discovery of new targeted therapeutics.

methodsThis review examines the recent literature on virus-megakaryopoiesis interactions in the context of clinical observations, case studies, systematic cellular and molecular mechanistic data, and finally emerging therapeutic interventions to tackle virus-induced thrombocytopenia.

resultsMegakaryocytes are exploited by many viruses for their survival and replication, thereby impairing proliferation, differentiation, maturation, and platelet release. Such disruptions lead to immune-mediated suppression and thrombocytopenia. Viruses also induce cell death pathways at different stages of megakaryopoiesis via both receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms. Thus, viral infection has a multifaceted effect on megakaryopoiesis, with consequences for host immune regulation and disease pathogenesis.

conclusionIn this review, we provide a brief overview of how viruses influence megakaryocyte development, maturation, and immune responses. Understanding this crucial host-virus pathophysiology is fundamental for developing targeted therapeutics to limit virus-induced adverse effects.

Indexed as

DENVMegakaryopoiesisPlateletsThrombocytopeniaVirus

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.