ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
Beyond emissions: a stochastic cusp-logit analysis of environmental cost regimes in BRICS.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging economies suffer a huge economic burdens from environmental damage because most of the time we measure environmental damage using conventional emissions-based metrics. This study addresses this gap by introducing environmental cost (EC) as a novel measure that quantifies the economic burden of environmental degradation. The need for the new measurement stems from the requirement to examine the non-linear and asymmetric behaviors of the relationship between the environment and the economy in rapidly developing economies such as the BRICS countries in their transition from fossil fuels, their drive for new types of innovation, and their increased susceptibility to sudden changes in the cost of degradation due to energy transition, innovation-related pressures, and vulnerability to sudden changes. Therefore, stabilizing mechanisms such as Energy Transition, Innovation, Environmental Adaptability, and Trade in Low-carbon Technologies (TLCT) will reduce the possibility of experiencing high levels of Environmental Cost, while Environmental Vulnerability (EV) will heighten the probability of experiencing catastrophic regime shifts to high-cost, unstable states with sudden and extreme changes in costs. To accomplish this objective of validating the Cusp-Logit framework, a balanced panel data consisting of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa) for the years 2015 to 2024 is used. The hybrid model of the Cusp-Logit framework consists of the geometrical layout of the Cusp Catastrophe model and a stochastic Logit transition mechanism that will capture the nonlinear regimes of the Cusp Catastrophe model and the dynamic persistence of costs associated with environmental degradation. Although empirical evidence points to the stabilizing effects of energy transition, innovation, environmental adaptability and TLCT on flattening the potential surface and reducing the possible occurrence & duration of high-cost regimes; EV creates a systemic tilt which increases the likelihood of a shift to an unstable/high-EC state. The cross-national analysis demonstrates that while China & India have stable innovation-based environments; Brazil, Russia & South Africa are much more susceptible to instability due to a limited ability to adapt to & utilize technology. Given that there is currently no comprehensive framework for understanding environmental performance in terms of costs; this work develops a new methodology for modeling the dynamic behaviors of asymmetrical regimes as well as understanding the transition probabilities between them. This provides an early warning system, which will assist BRICS policymakers to manage their exposure to environmental risks while moving towards developing sustainable pathways with low cost. Unlike conventional emission-based and linear approaches, the proposed framework captures nonlinear regime shifts, transition probabilities, and persistence of environmental cost dynamics, offering a scalable tool for policy design under uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.