Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223894›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

The Italian landscape of robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: results from a national survey.

C Guidetti, S Serni, U Boggi, A Solinas, F Tanese, A Lauterio, A Volpe, B Catellani, G P Guerrini, T M Manzia and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

C GuidettiHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
S SerniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
U BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
A SolinasDepartment of Urology, Kidney Transplant and Robotic Surgery, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.
F TaneseUrology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Regenerative and Precision Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
A LauterioGeneral Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Milano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
A VolpeDivision of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, Maggiore Della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
B CatellaniHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
G P GuerriniHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
T M ManziaHepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
D LorenzinLiver-Kidney Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
A PuzzielloDipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia e Odontoiatria, Campus Universitario di Baronissi (SA) - Università di Salerno, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
M RomanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit - Treviso Hospital, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
M SpadaDivision of Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Liver and Kidney Transplantation, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
A AntonelliUnità Dipartimentale Trapianti di Rene, Dipartimento di Chirurgia ed Odontoiatria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
G CarcanoDepartment of Medicine and Technological Innovation, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
N BossiniUnit of Nephrology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
M IariaDivision of General Surgery, Transplant Surgery Unit, Department of General and Specialized Surgery, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
M VivarelliHPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
M RossiGeneral Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy.
P RigottiPancreatic and Transplant Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
L FurianKidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
R I TroisiDivision of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
S Di SandroHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.
F Di BenedettoHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy. fabrizio.dibenedetto@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6718-8760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is an emerging minimally invasive alternative to open surgery that offers potential benefits in selected recipients. Despite increasing international interest, its implementation across transplant centers remains variable. This study aims to describe the current status, challenges, and perspectives on RAKT in Italy through a nationwide survey. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to all active kidney transplant centers in Italy. The survey collected data on institutional experience, surgical techniques, intraoperative technologies, perceived barriers, and future directions. Responses were anonymized and analyzed descriptively. Twenty-one out of 39 centers responded (54%). Nine centers were actively performing RAKT at the time of the survey. The median number of RAKT cases per center was 5 (range 1-85), with Da Vinci Xi being the most used platform. Intraoperative tools such as indocyanine green fluorescence and robotic Doppler were variably adopted to verify graft perfusion. Reported operative times ranged from 143 to 410 min (median 215 min), with low conversion rates. Main barriers to adoption included limited access to the robotic platform and lack of structured training. All centers supported the creation of a national registry and expressed interest in collaborative studies. This survey provides the first national overview of RAKT in Italy, highlighting both technical feasibility and structural challenges. The findings support the need for coordinated training efforts, shared data, and policy-level initiatives to foster equitable access to robotic transplant surgery.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansItalyOperative TimeSurveys and QuestionnairesKidney transplantNational surveyRobotic assisted kidney transplantRobotic surgeryWeb-based survey

Identifiers

PMID42223894
PMCPMC13538201

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.