ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
The Italian landscape of robotic-assisted kidney transplantation: results from a national survey.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is an emerging minimally invasive alternative to open surgery that offers potential benefits in selected recipients. Despite increasing international interest, its implementation across transplant centers remains variable. This study aims to describe the current status, challenges, and perspectives on RAKT in Italy through a nationwide survey. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to all active kidney transplant centers in Italy. The survey collected data on institutional experience, surgical techniques, intraoperative technologies, perceived barriers, and future directions. Responses were anonymized and analyzed descriptively. Twenty-one out of 39 centers responded (54%). Nine centers were actively performing RAKT at the time of the survey. The median number of RAKT cases per center was 5 (range 1-85), with Da Vinci Xi being the most used platform. Intraoperative tools such as indocyanine green fluorescence and robotic Doppler were variably adopted to verify graft perfusion. Reported operative times ranged from 143 to 410 min (median 215 min), with low conversion rates. Main barriers to adoption included limited access to the robotic platform and lack of structured training. All centers supported the creation of a national registry and expressed interest in collaborative studies. This survey provides the first national overview of RAKT in Italy, highlighting both technical feasibility and structural challenges. The findings support the need for coordinated training efforts, shared data, and policy-level initiatives to foster equitable access to robotic transplant surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.