ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2026
Menopause and Plantar Heel Pain: Findings From a Series of Focus Groups Exploring Lived Experience.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlantar heel pain (PHP) is a debilitating problem disproportionately affecting women between the age of 40 and 60 at twice the rate of men, coinciding with perimenopause and menopause. Whether a causative relationship exists is uncertain, but their concurrence presents challenges for both patients and healthcare providers.
aimTo conduct focus groups to understand people's perception of menopause and PHP. The primary objective was to identify whether people with experience of PHP and menopause or their healthcare providers, thought their PHP was related to menopausal status. The secondary objective was to find out if this population thought this was an important area of research and what the barriers may be for further investigation.
methodsFollowing National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) guidance on 'co-producing a research project', 17 participants were invited via VOICE GLOBAL public engagement UK platform to take part in focus groups with 5-6 participants in each session. Participants self-identified as having experienced PHP and were either perimenopausal or postmenopausal. Each group was asked if they felt that there was an association between PHP and menopausal status; if a link between menopause and PHP was made by their healthcare provider; if research in this area was important and what the barriers may be to further investigation in this area.
resultsOf the 17 participants, 76% did not initially perceive that there to be an association between menopause and PHP and reported that it was not mentioned in their healthcare consultations when they sought help. Some felt stigma remained around the menopause, particularly in ethnic minority communities, and that this may be a barrier to further research. Participants unanimously felt that this was an area that needed more investigation, with improved awareness on the part of healthcare providers being particularly important.
conclusionsParticipants felt the relationship between menopause and PHP requires further investigation, with a focus on understanding the level of awareness of association among healthcare professionals and patients. The implementation of any findings needs to consider ethnic and cultural barriers, and those that may be present in a primary care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.