ArticlePloS one2026
"Probably a Little Bit of a Hill to Climb": A qualitative study of emergency department providers' perceptions of nonpharmacological pain treatment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNonpharmacological strategies are advocated as evidence-based treatment options for pain, yet these are rarely offered within the emergency department (ED) setting. Understanding how ED providers perceive these strategies can guide implementation efforts.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to qualitatively examine ED provider perceptions of conventional and complementary nonpharmacological pain strategies.
methodsNine ED physicians from a single academic medical center completed a semi-structured interview conducted by a trained qualitative researcher. The interview focused on the provider's current pain management approach and perceived benefits, barriers, and facilitators of nonpharmacological pain treatments. Each interview was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using an iterative deductive-inductive approach. Findings were organized into themes and subthemes to inform a conceptual model of nonpharmacological intervention implementation.
resultsSix major themes emerged: 1) institutional context around intervention implementation, 2) professional beliefs about nonpharmacological pain interventions, 3) patient characteristics as a modifying factor, 4) intervention characteristics as a modifying factor, 5) process of implementation, and 6) engagement. Providers acknowledged benefits of nonpharmacological strategies, particularly for patients with chronic pain or history of opioid use. However, perceived barriers included negative patient perceptions of mind-body therapies, minimal ED provider training or education, limited time or care coordination support, and lack of physical space. Possible facilitators for integration included provider education, leadership support, and intervention tailoring.
conclusionED providers recognize the potential value of nonpharmacological pain treatment strategies. However, both broad healthcare and ED-specific barriers to implementation may limit routine use in the ED. Future efforts for improving pain management in the ED should identify strategies to address implementation barriers of evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.