ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Synthetic pectin-cellulose nanofiber capsule recapitulates the mechanical properties of a regenerating plant cell wall.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic pectin-cellulose nanofiber capsule recapitulates the mechanical properties of a regenerating plant cell wall.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Disentangling Pectin and Cellulose Nanostructures in Synthetic Plant Cell Walls with Small-Angle Neutron Scattering.Biomacromolecules · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant primary cell walls are dynamic supramolecular assemblies composed of layered cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin, progressively built through synthesis and secretion. However, the specific architectural features and structural components sufficient to endow the mechanical properties of the wall remain unclear. Here, we construct a minimal synthetic spherical shell and compare its structural and mechanical properties to those of a plant single-cell system. To eliminate complexities from intercellular connectivity and developmental history, we exploit the ability of plant protoplasts to regenerate cell walls de novo. Compression tests of regenerating protoplasts between parallel plates reveal that wall stiffness increases with wall thickening over time. Despite differences in assembly pathways, architecture, and composition, the synthetic shell exhibits a similar thickness-dependent modulus and similar material stiffness. The synthetic shell, mainly composed of pectin and cellulose nanofibers, mirrors the mechanical behavior of regenerating primary cell walls, suggesting that these components play a major role in conferring key mechanical properties in the limit of compressive small deformations. Extending this comparative approach should allow similarities and differences in component interactions in controlling wall behavior to be identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.