Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225443›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2026

Reframing "paradoxical" excitation: disentangling electroencephalogram complexity and entropy reveals resting-state dynamics associated with propofol susceptibility in healthy adults.

Derek Newman, Charlotte Maschke, George A Mashour, Stefanie Blain-Moraes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Derek NewmanMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: derek.newman@mail.mcgill.ca.
Charlotte MaschkeMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Aix Marseille Université, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
George A MashourDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medicine School, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stefanie Blain-MoraesMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada; School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address: stefanie.blain-moraes@mcgill.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPropofol exposure can produce heterogeneous neural responses, from the expected suppression to transient paradoxical excitation. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures of signal complexity and entropy have emerged as reliable markers of consciousness, but different types of complexity and entropy measures are often conflated. We used Type I and II complexity measures on the complexity-entropy causal plane (CECP) to characterise divergent neural trajectories during propofol-induced loss of consciousness. We hypothesised that paradoxical excitation is reflected in both Type I and Type II complexity; that divergent trajectories on the CECP separate paradoxical excitation from suppression; and that baseline EEG complexity is associated with susceptibility to propofol.

methodsWe analysed EEG data from two independent cohorts of healthy adults receiving propofol: the Chennu dataset (n=20), which included resting-state baseline, mild, and moderate sedation, followed by a recovery period; and the ReCCognition dataset (n=8), which used escalating infusions from baseline to deep sedation. For each participant and sedation level, we extracted Lempel-Ziv complexity (Type I) and statistical complexity (Type II) and projected them onto the CECP. Pearson correlations related baseline statistical complexity to changes in statistical complexity during moderate sedation; behavioural responsiveness; effect-site propofol concentration; and time to loss of consciousness.

resultsAt moderate sedation, participants who remained responsive showed paradoxical increases in Lempel-Ziv Complexity and decreases in statistical complexity, whereas unresponsive participants exhibited the opposite pattern. Baseline statistical complexity correlated negatively with both the change in statistical complexity (r=-0.88) and behavioural responsiveness, indicating that intrinsic brain dynamics influence individual susceptibility to sedation. CECP trajectories revealed a reproducible inflection point demarcating paradoxical excitation from suppression.

conclusionsMapping EEG trajectories on the CECP bridges anaesthetic state transitions with underlying neural dynamics. Baseline EEG complexity indexes individual sensitivity to propofol, determining whether brain dynamics transiently enter excitation or direct suppression.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousElectroencephalographyHypnotics and SedativesPropofolAdultConsciousnessEntropyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAnesthetics, IntravenousHypnotics and SedativesPropofolanaesthesiacomplexityconsciousnessEEGentropyparadoxical excitationtype II complexity

Identifiers

PMID42225443
PMCPMC13494104

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.