ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2026
Reframing "paradoxical" excitation: disentangling electroencephalogram complexity and entropy reveals resting-state dynamics associated with propofol susceptibility in healthy adults.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPropofol exposure can produce heterogeneous neural responses, from the expected suppression to transient paradoxical excitation. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures of signal complexity and entropy have emerged as reliable markers of consciousness, but different types of complexity and entropy measures are often conflated. We used Type I and II complexity measures on the complexity-entropy causal plane (CECP) to characterise divergent neural trajectories during propofol-induced loss of consciousness. We hypothesised that paradoxical excitation is reflected in both Type I and Type II complexity; that divergent trajectories on the CECP separate paradoxical excitation from suppression; and that baseline EEG complexity is associated with susceptibility to propofol.
methodsWe analysed EEG data from two independent cohorts of healthy adults receiving propofol: the Chennu dataset (n=20), which included resting-state baseline, mild, and moderate sedation, followed by a recovery period; and the ReCCognition dataset (n=8), which used escalating infusions from baseline to deep sedation. For each participant and sedation level, we extracted Lempel-Ziv complexity (Type I) and statistical complexity (Type II) and projected them onto the CECP. Pearson correlations related baseline statistical complexity to changes in statistical complexity during moderate sedation; behavioural responsiveness; effect-site propofol concentration; and time to loss of consciousness.
resultsAt moderate sedation, participants who remained responsive showed paradoxical increases in Lempel-Ziv Complexity and decreases in statistical complexity, whereas unresponsive participants exhibited the opposite pattern. Baseline statistical complexity correlated negatively with both the change in statistical complexity (r=-0.88) and behavioural responsiveness, indicating that intrinsic brain dynamics influence individual susceptibility to sedation. CECP trajectories revealed a reproducible inflection point demarcating paradoxical excitation from suppression.
conclusionsMapping EEG trajectories on the CECP bridges anaesthetic state transitions with underlying neural dynamics. Baseline EEG complexity indexes individual sensitivity to propofol, determining whether brain dynamics transiently enter excitation or direct suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.