ArticleLight, science & applications2026
Universal and transferable attacks on pathology foundation models using microscopic perturbations.
Article in Light, science & applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optical digital twins for disease prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and intervention.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of foundation models initiated a paradigm shift in pathology and optical microscopy. However, these powerful systems also introduce vulnerabilities, making them susceptible to adversarial attacks. To shed light on these potential threats, here we introduce Universal and Transferable Adversarial Perturbations (UTAP) for pathology foundation models that reveal critical vulnerabilities. Optimized using deep learning, UTAP comprises a fixed and weak microscopic noise pattern that, when added to a pathology image, systematically disrupts the feature representation capabilities of foundation models. Therefore, UTAP induces performance drops in downstream tasks that utilize foundation models, including misclassification across a wide range of unseen data distributions. We demonstrate two key features of UTAP: (1) universality: its microscopic perturbation can be applied across diverse field-of-views independent of the dataset that UTAP was developed on, and (2) transferability: its perturbation can successfully degrade the performance of various external, black-box pathology foundation models-never seen before. These indicate that UTAP is not a dedicated attack associated with a specific foundation model or microscopy image dataset, but rather constitutes a broad threat to pathology foundation models and their applications. We evaluated UTAP across various state-of-the-art pathology foundation models on multiple datasets, causing significant drops in their performance with visually imperceptible microscopic modifications to the input images using a fixed noise pattern. The development of these potent attacks establishes a benchmark for model robustness evaluation, highlighting a need for advancing defense mechanisms to ensure the safe/reliable deployment of AI in pathology and optical microscopy.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.