ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative evaluation of CNN models for nasopharyngeal carcinoma classification on pathology data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a systematic evaluation of deep learning models for the classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using whole slide images (WSIs) obtained from Sarawak General Hospital (SGH) and Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL). NPC, a malignancy with high prevalence in Southeast Asia, presents diagnostic challenges due to the histological similarities between normal and pathological tissues. A dataset of 88,002 images, annotated by expert pathologists and categorized into four classes: normal, lymphoid hyperplasia (LHP), nasopharyngeal inflammation (NPI), and NPC, was utilized for model training and evaluation. Several convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, including DenseNet201, MobileNet, EfficientNetB0, InceptionNet, XceptionNet, VGG16, and NASNetMobile were systematically assessed alongside hybrid architectures formed through intermediate-level feature fusion of top-performing backbones. All models were evaluated using accuracy, precision, F1-score, and training time to ensure a balanced assessment of predictive performance and computational efficiency. Among individual models, MobileNet achieved the highest accuracy (96.9%), while DenseNet201 demonstrated the most balanced classification performance with the highest F1-score (94.9%). The hybrid EfficientNetB0 + DenseNet201 model achieved the overall best accuracy (97.6%), indicating that combining complementary feature representations can further enhance predictive capability. The integration of data augmentation and class weighting effectively mitigated dataset imbalance, resulting in substantial improvements in generalization and minority class recognition. Overall, the findings highlight the strong potential of optimized CNN architectures and feature-level fusion strategies for robust multi-class NPC classification, supporting their applicability in computer-aided diagnosis and assisting pathologists in improving diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.