Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42225759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhancing multimodal inpatient fall prediction via nursing statement integration within the OMOP common data model.

Hyejin Hong, Soyeon Kim, Borim Ryu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyejin HongData Science Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soyeon KimData Science Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Borim RyuData Science Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. borim.ryu@gmail.com.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) RS-2023-00241887NAVER Corporation 3720250025Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University (SMG-SNU) Boramae Medical Center (BMC) 04-2025-0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of inpatient falls is a cornerstone of patient safety, yet conventional models often overlook the rich clinical context embedded in nursing records. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models by integrating structured clinical data from a Common Data Model (CDM) with nursing statements, evaluating whether nursing documentation provides incremental predictive value for fall risk stratification. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using adult inpatient data mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM, linked with nursing statements characterizing patients' functional status, mobility, mental status, and care dependency. Four algorithms-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost-were trained and evaluated across three distinct feature sets: CDM-only, nursing-only, and combined. Model performance was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity. Model interpretability and feature contributions were elucidated using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis. Integrated models (CDM + nursing) consistently outperformed single-source models, demonstrating superior discriminative power and a more balanced sensitivity-specificity profile. Notably, models utilizing only nursing statements achieved performance comparable to CDM-only models, indicating that nursing documentation captures critical safety-relevant information often latent in structured electronic health records. Ensemble methods, particularly XGBoost, demonstrated the highest discrimination. SHAP analysis revealed that nursing-derived indicators, such as documented "Reports weakness" and "At risk of falling" were among the most influential predictors, providing context-rich insights beyond standard clinical variables. The integration of coded nursing statements with structured CDM data enhances both the accuracy and interpretability of inpatient fall risk predictions. These findings underscore the importance of leveraging unstructured clinical documentation to develop transparent, AI-driven clinical decision support systems for proactive fall prevention in hospital settings.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsInpatientsNursing RecordsAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveClinical decision supportCommon data modelFall risk predictionInpatient fallsMachine learningNursing documentation

Identifiers

PMID42225759
PMCPMC13457609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.