Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effects on secondary outcomes following a three-month personalized app-based lifestyle intervention among working adults: a three-armed randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lifestyle improvements can bring individual and societal benefits. Most interventions are standardized; however, personalized interventions may be more effective. We examined the effect of a personalized app‑based lifestyle intervention, with or without monthly coaching, on physical activity, diet, alcohol, sleep, stress, and smoking, in a three‑month randomized controlled trial. Office workers and bus drivers (n = 209) were randomized 1:1:1 to app, app-coach, or control group. Differences in change from baseline to follow‑up were analysed using robust linear regression, with the control group as the reference. Participants were on average 48.2 years and 42% were female. Both intervention groups increased minutes of exercise (app group β = 15.7 min/week, 95% CI: 3.5, 27.9; app-coach group β = 13.8 min/week, 95% CI: 1.4, 26.1). Compared to the control group, participants in the app-coach group increased their vegetable intake (β = 51.8 g/day, 95% CI: 2.5, 101.1) and fruit and vegetable intake (β = 87.7 g/day 95% CI: 8.9, 166.6). Participants in the app-coach group also increased time in bed (β = 0.43 h/night, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.81) and sleep duration (β = 0.40 h/night, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.78). No other outcomes differed between groups. While the effects seen on physical activity, diet and sleep were limited, even small behavioural changes can benefit health. Though, the effect of coaching needs further evaluation. Future personalized app-based interventions have potential to improve lifestyle behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.