ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Identifying factors contributing to health workers' preferences for elective caesarean section: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spiritual Care Empowerment and Midwives' Adherence to the Maternal Rights Charter: A Quasiexperimental Study Using 360-Degree Evaluation.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean section (CS) rates continue to increase worldwide, driven by multiple factors. This qualitative study explored how health workers, as maternity clients choosing their own mode of childbirth, understood the factors influencing their preference for elective CS.
methodsThis qualitative descriptive study used conventional content analysis. Between October 2023 and May 2024, we purposively recruited 24 health workers affiliated with Qom University of Medical Sciences from teaching hospitals, primary healthcare centres, and university academic departments. Eligible participants had undergone an elective caesarean section for their own childbirth within the previous two years. Data were collected through in-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews in Persian and analysed in MAXQDA 18 using the approach described by Graneheim and Lundman.
resultsAnalysis of the 24 interviews generated 120 initial codes, two themes, five categories, and 14 subcategories. Health workers' preference for elective caesarean section was shaped by fears and concerns related to labour and vaginal birth, including fear of labour pain, concerns about maternal and newborn safety, anticipated loss of privacy and dignity, and negative perceptions of vaginal birth. Practical considerations, particularly the predictability of caesarean section for managing timing, work, and family responsibilities, also contributed to decision-making. Health-system conditions included limited confidence in the availability of labour pain relief, restrictions on labour companionship, concerns about staff behaviour and competence, and easier access to caesarean section through professional familiarity with specialists.
conclusionsThese context-specific findings point to potential areas for maternity-service improvement, including strengthening respectful maternity care, improving reliable access to labour pain relief, protecting privacy and dignity during labour, and reviewing institutional practices that may shape negative expectations of vaginal birth among health workers as maternity clients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.