ArticleVirology journal2026
Post-marketing safety profile of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide: a FAERS pharmacovigilance study with EudraVigilance validation and mechanistic investigation of pancreatitis.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) has demonstrated strong efficacy and favorable tolerability as a first-line HIV treatment. However, there is a lack of long-term safety data from large-scale studies and real-world settings. This study aimed to evaluate the post-marketing safety of BIC/FTC/TAF using the FAERS database, with external validation in EudraVigilance, and to further explore the potential mechanisms underlying the pancreatitis signal.
methodsA retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using data from FAERS from 2018 to 2025. deduplication, disproportionality analyses were performed using the reporting odds ratio and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network methods, with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Sex-stratified analyses, time-to-onset analyses, and sensitivity analyses were additionally performed. Key findings were externally validated using EudraVigilance. Because pancreatitis emerged as an unexpected and clinically important signal, logistic regression, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and transcriptomic validation were further applied to explore its potential biological basis.
resultsA total of 5,815 adverse drug (ADE) reports were identified in FAERS, Reports were more frequently submitted for male patients. Several identified positive ADEs were consistent with the drug label, such as weight increase (n = 526, ROR 10.32), headache (n = 239, ROR 1.56), immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) (n = 113, ROR 76.26). Unexpected signals included "pancreatitis" (n = 51, ROR 4.37), "dysphagia" (n = 104, ROR 4.47), and "mental disorder (n = 33, ROR 3.3). Sex-stratified analyses showed more positive signals in males than in females, with differences in the signal spectrum between subgroups. Among 813 reports with valid time-to-onset data, most adverse events occurred within the first month, although approximately one-quarter were reported after 1 year. External validation in EudraVigilance identified 75 overlapping signals with FAERS, including weight increased, insomnia, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and acute pancreatitis. Mechanistic analyses suggested that BIC/FTC/TAF-associated pancreatitis may involve inflammatory and metabolic pathways, particularly the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, with hub targets including NFKB1, AKT1, STAT3, and MMP9.
conclusionThis study expands the post-marketing safety profile of BIC/FTC/TAF by identifying both recognized and potentially emerging adverse event signals in real-world pharmacovigilance data. Cross-database replication supported the robustness of several findings, particularly metabolic, psychiatric, renal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic signals. Although these findings are hypothesis-generating rather than evidence of causality, they support continued clinical vigilance during both early and long-term BIC/FTC/TAF treatment, especially in patients with polypharmacy or metabolic vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.