Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226240›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026

Prediction of disease resilience of pigs using multi-omics data.

Yulu Chen, Steven Lonergan, Kyu-Sang Lim, Jian Cheng, Elda Dervishi, Michael K Dyck, Edward Steadham, PigGen Canada, Frederic Fortin, John C S Harding and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yulu ChenDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 239D Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Steven LonerganDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 239D Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Kyu-Sang LimDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 239D Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Jian ChengDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 239D Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Elda DervishiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Michael K DyckDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Edward SteadhamDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 239D Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
PigGen CanadaPigGen Canada Research Consortium, Guelph, ON, N1H4G8, Canada.
Frederic FortinCentre de Développement du Porc du Québec Inc., Québec City, G1V 4M6, Canada.
John C S HardingDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Graham S PlastowDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 239D Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. jdekkers@iastate.edu.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67007-26144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic prediction is widely used in pig breeding, but phenotypic prediction of complex traits such as disease resilience remains limited because genotypes alone do not capture infection-induced regulatory responses, environmental and management effects, or their interactions. Blood molecular profiles measured in young healthy pigs reflect both genetic and non-genetic influences and may improve prediction of performance under disease challenge. We evaluated whether integrating multiple blood-based omics layers with genomic data improves prediction of production and disease resilience phenotypes in pigs exposed to a polymicrobial disease challenge.

resultsData were from 836 healthy pigs from 15 batches with transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiles measured in blood collected at ~27 days of age, before transfer into a natural polymicrobial disease challenge at ~40 days of age. Pigs were also genotyped using a commercial 650 K marker array. We analyzed 21 traits related to growth, health scores, antibiotic treatments, mortality, feed efficiency, and carcass traits using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) animal models with random animal effects based on relationship matrices constructed from genomic (G), transcriptomic (T), proteomic (P), and metabolomic (M) data. Across traits, G-BLUP explained the largest proportion of phenotypic variance for most traits. However, T-, P-, or M-BLUP explained similar or greater variance than G-BLUP for several growth and health traits recorded before challenge. Adding T and/or M to G-BLUP generally increased variance explained and improved prediction accuracy for pre-challenge growth rate and health scores, and for mortality and carcass weight after challenge. Models combining G, T, and M often yielded the highest accuracies, whereas adding P did not consistently improve accuracy. For later grow-finish traits, gains from multi-omics were smaller and less consistent.

conclusionsBlood multi-omics profiles from healthy young pigs can improve prediction of performance and disease resilience beyond genomic data alone. Gains were greatest for traits recorded before challenge and for some resilience traits expressed soon after pathogen exposure, suggesting that pre-challenge molecular profiles capture latent resilience potential. These findings support the use of pre-challenge blood multi-omics as biomarkers for precision management and as a basis for breeding and management strategies targeting disease resilience in pigs.

Indexed as

Disease resilienceGenomicsMetabolomicsMulti-omicsNatural disease challenge modelPhenotype predictionPigsProteomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42226240
PMCPMC13227672

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.