ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
The impact of modified esophageal stenting on oral intake in delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpontaneous esophageal perforation, commonly referred to as Boerhaave syndrome, is a rare but life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate. Delayed diagnosis is common due to nonspecific symptoms, and optimal treatment remains challenging. This study evaluates the outcomes of a modified esophageal stenting technique in patients with a delayed diagnosis.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 18 patients treated for spontaneous esophageal perforation at a tertiary medical center between July 2012 and July 2022. Patients were divided into early (< 24 h) and delayed (≥ 24 h) diagnosis groups. A modified esophageal stenting approach, which combined fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) placement across the esophagogastric junction with minimally invasive drainage and external fixation, was applied in selected delayed cases. Outcomes were compared between the treatment strategies.
resultsAmong the 11 patients in the delayed group, 5 underwent modified esophageal stenting. These patients had significantly lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores and shorter operative durations compared to those receiving other treatments. Although the overall complication and mortality rates were higher in the delayed group (45.5% and 18.2%, respectively), patients treated with modified stenting were more likely to resume oral nutrition at discharge (p = 0.048), without an increase in hospital stay or postoperative complications.
conclusionsModified esophageal stenting is a promising, less invasive option for managing delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation, facilitating earlier recovery without compromising safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.