Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Ciprofol-Esketamine Versus Ciprofol-Remifentanil in Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although ciprofol is a novel intravenous anesthetic known for its respiratory and hemodynamic stability, its use in hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy (HEP) has rarely been reported. Therefore, this study investigated the therapeutic potential of a novel combination of ciprofol and esketamine to reduce complications and enhance recovery after HEP. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study enrolled 120 patients with endometrial polyps who underwent HEP. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ciprofol plus esketamine (group CK, n=60) or ciprofol plus remifentanil (group CR, n=60). Two minutes after an initial bolus of esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) or remifentanil (1 μg/kg), all patients received a standardized ciprofol bolus (0.4 mg/kg). The primary endpoint was transient hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic parameters, recovery time, ciprofol consumption, adverse events, gynecologist satisfaction, and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. RESULTS Compared with CR, CK significantly reduced hypoxemia (1.7% vs 35.0%; P<0.001) and hypotension (16.7% vs 33.3%; P=0.035). Post-induction systolic blood pressure was lower in group CR (P=0.047), but other hemodynamic parameters were similar between groups. CK provided superior early analgesia (VAS at 10 min: 2.2±0.7 vs 2.9±0.9; P<0.001). Other outcomes were comparable (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The CK combination confers a clinical advantage over the CR combination for HEP. By mitigating the risk of hypoxemia and providing more effective short-term postoperative analgesia, the CK protocol represents a promising and potentially safer sedation regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.