Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226428›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026

Ciprofol-Esketamine Versus Ciprofol-Remifentanil in Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhong Zhang, Zhixu Wang, Wanwan Gong, Wei Jiang, Longjiao Zheng, Zhiyang Yu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhong ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Zhixu WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Wanwan GongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Longjiao ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiyang YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Huishan Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Wuxi Huishan District People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although ciprofol is a novel intravenous anesthetic known for its respiratory and hemodynamic stability, its use in hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy (HEP) has rarely been reported. Therefore, this study investigated the therapeutic potential of a novel combination of ciprofol and esketamine to reduce complications and enhance recovery after HEP. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study enrolled 120 patients with endometrial polyps who underwent HEP. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ciprofol plus esketamine (group CK, n=60) or ciprofol plus remifentanil (group CR, n=60). Two minutes after an initial bolus of esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) or remifentanil (1 μg/kg), all patients received a standardized ciprofol bolus (0.4 mg/kg). The primary endpoint was transient hypoxemia. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic parameters, recovery time, ciprofol consumption, adverse events, gynecologist satisfaction, and postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. RESULTS Compared with CR, CK significantly reduced hypoxemia (1.7% vs 35.0%; P<0.001) and hypotension (16.7% vs 33.3%; P=0.035). Post-induction systolic blood pressure was lower in group CR (P=0.047), but other hemodynamic parameters were similar between groups. CK provided superior early analgesia (VAS at 10 min: 2.2±0.7 vs 2.9±0.9; P<0.001). Other outcomes were comparable (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The CK combination confers a clinical advantage over the CR combination for HEP. By mitigating the risk of hypoxemia and providing more effective short-term postoperative analgesia, the CK protocol represents a promising and potentially safer sedation regimen.

Indexed as

HysteroscopyKetaminePolypsRemifentanilAdultCyclopropanesEndometriumFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMiddle AgedProspective Studies(2-(1R)-1-cyclopropyl)ethyl-6-isopropyl-phenolCyclopropanesKetamineRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID42226428
PMCPMC13242170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.