ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Post-Stroke Functional Recovery Based on Clinical and Nursing Factors.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction model for unfavorable functional recovery at 6 months after stroke, incorporating clinical and modifiable nursing-related predictors to support early risk stratification and individualized nursing interventions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 1340 stroke patients from a tertiary hospital. Demographic, clinical, imaging, nursing, and psychosocial data were collected. The dataset was split into training and testing sets at a 7:3 ratio using outcome-stratified sampling. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used as a predictor screening procedure. A nomogram-based risk prediction model was developed and evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. Patients were further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on predicted probability tertiles from the training set. Results: Older age, prior stroke history, comorbidity burden, longer onset-to-admission time, greater neurological deficit severity, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, and brainstem lesions were independent predictors of unfavorable recovery. Early out-of-bed mobilization within 48 hours, higher self-management behavior score, absence of depressive symptoms, and better social support were linked to reduced risk. The model showed good discrimination and calibration in both sets. Risk stratification showed a stepwise increase in unfavorable recovery rates across the three risk groups. Decision curve analysis indicated net clinical benefit within a reasonable threshold probability range. Conclusion: The developed model combines clinical and modifiable nursing-related predictors and demonstrates good predictive performance. It may serve as a practical tool for early risk stratification and targeted nursing interventions in stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.