ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Healthcare System Transition in Kazakhstan and Its Impact on Inguinal Hernia Repair Outcomes: A Multidisciplinary Comparative Analysis of TEP, TIPP, and Open Lichtenstein Procedures.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Twins for Hospital and Healthcare Operations: A Systematic Review of Resource Allocation, Infection Control, and Workflow Optimization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of inguinal hernia repair (IHR) in transition economies remains a challenge where clinical adoption of international guidelines, such as HerniaSurge 2023, is often hindered by legacy funding models. This study evaluates the impact of surgical technique transition on clinical outcomes, cost-utility, and institutional resource turnover in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Methods: A prospective-retrospective analysis of 505 patients was conducted (January 2021 to December 2023). For clinical comparison, a matched subgroup (n=138) was analyzed, comparing Open Lichtenstein (n=56), Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP, n=42), and Open Transinguinal Preperitoneal (TIPP, n=40) repairs. Clinical outcomes were quantified via the EuraHS-QoL scale. Economic efficiency was modeled using Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). We introduced the System Burden Index (SBI) - calculated as the ratio of category mean length of stay (LOS) to population average - to identify productivity bottlenecks across financing channels (Commercial, Government Quotas, and City Budget). Results: Posterior approach techniques (TEP and TIPP) significantly reduced postoperative pain frequency compared to the Lichtenstein group (26.2% and 32.5% vs. 51.8%, p=0.013). TEP was identified as the dominant strategy for cost-utility. Management analysis revealed a significant "Efficiency Gap" across funding sectors: government quota cases showed a mean LOS of 8.31 days (SBI 1.28) compared to 5.37 days (SBI 0.83) in the commercial sector. Our predictive model suggests that transitioning state-funded sectors to rapid-recovery protocols could potentially reclaim 4.7 bed-days per patient. Conclusion: Transitioning to TEP/TIPP protocols is a key factor for enhancing healthcare capacity in Kazakhstan. Shifting reimbursement logic from bed-day occupancy to value-based outcome packages is essential to align regional practice with global surgical standards and optimize institutional throughput.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.