SynthesisSports medicine - open2026
High-Intensity Training Increases Osteocalcin Levels: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Exercise on Bone Remodeling biomarkers.
Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between biomarkers of bone remodeling due to systematic training is not known, it is not possible to predict the optimal type and volume of exercise for bone remodeling.
objectiveWe aimed to quantify the effects of systematic training on bone remodeling biomarkers, particularly osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase in healthy adult populations.
methodsThis study (PROSPERO: CRD42023483811) explored the effects of systematic training (training programs lasting more than two weeks) through a systematic review and meta-analysis and included only randomized controlled trials of different types (endurance, power, and mixed) and intensities, frequency and duration of training. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched on November 22, 2023, and we updated the search on 19, September 2025. Risk-of-bias and quality assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 (RoB2) tool and the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool (GRADEpro).
resultsA total of 16,434 records were screened, and 24 studies with 1,238 participants were analyzed. Endurance training showed no significant effect on osteocalcin level. High- and low-intensity endurance training also had no significant effect on osteocalcin. High-intensity training significantly increased osteocalcin levels (MD = 6.88; 95% CI 0.37 to 13.38). Endurance training significantly decreased the Body Mass Index (MD = -1.40; 95% CI -2.23 to -0.57). Power training showed no significant change in osteocalcin levels. Mixed training (endurance + power) did not significantly change osteocalcin levels. Bone alkaline phosphatase showed no significant change following endurance training. Bone Mineral Density showed no significant changes after endurance or power training. The risk of bias was low for all outcomes. GRADEpro assessment for osteocalcin in the high-intensity training group revealed moderate to low certainty.
conclusionThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of systematic training on bone biomarkers in healthy adults. Our findings show that high-intensity systematic training significantly decreases Body Mass Index and significantly increases osteocalcin levels, whereas other training types had no effect.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.