Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228569›Full record

ArticleCell reports2026

Model-based and model-free valuation signals in the human brain vary markedly in relation to individual differences in behavioral control.

Weilun Ding, Jeffrey Cockburn, Julia Pia Simon, Amogh Johri, Scarlet J Cho, Sarah Oh, Jamie D Feusner, Reza Tadayonnejad, John P O'Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Weilun DingDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Jeffrey CockburnDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Julia Pia SimonDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Amogh JohriDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Scarlet J ChoDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Sarah OhDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jamie D FeusnerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College St., Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Reza TadayonnejadDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; TMS Clinical and Research Service, Neuromodulation Division, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
John P O'DohertyDivision of Humanities & Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. Electronic address: jdoherty@caltech.edu.

Funding

Determining the explanatory utility of computational reinforcement-learning theories of goal-directed and habitual control at behavioral and neural levelsR01MH121089 · NIMH · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI O'DOHERTY, JOHN P · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human action selection under reinforcement is believed to rely on two distinct strategies: model-free and model-based reinforcement learning. While behavior in sequential decision-making tasks often reflects a mixture of both, the neural basis of individual differences in their expression remains unclear. Here, we conduct a large-scale fMRI study with 179 participants performing a variant of the two-step task. Using both cluster-defined subgroups and computational parameter estimates, we find that in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, model-based value signals are strongly linked to the degree of model-based behavioral reliance, whereas model-free signals are ubiquitous across individuals regardless of model-free behavioral influence. Individuals lacking model-based behaviors and model-based neural signals, exhibit impaired state prediction errors (a key signal for learning a model of the environment) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and intraparietal sulcus, suggesting that reduced model-based control may depend in part on underlying difficulties in forming accurate model-based predictions.

Indexed as

BehaviorBrainIndividualityAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexReinforcement Machine LearningYoung AdultCP: neurosciencedecision valueindividual differencesmodel-based model-freeprediction errorsreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID42228569
PMCPMC13427246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.