Trial reportJMIR formative research2026
Preliminary Evaluation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Osteoporosis Self-Management Education: Formative Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the increasing burden of chronic diseases, self-management education (SME) is crucial. Traditional SME based on face-to-face delivery by clinicians is resource-intensive, and general digital tools such as web-based platforms often provide limited interactivity for patient learning. Although chatbots based on large language models (LLMs) show promise in interactivity, their real-world effectiveness lacks empirical evidence.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an LLM-based chatbot specifically designed for osteoporosis SME.
methodsA formative randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital from February 2024 to March 2025. Adults aged ≥18 years with osteoporosis were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to either the intervention (OPBot) group or a control group receiving traditional health education. The chatbot provided interactive educational content and question-and-answer support, while the control group received face-to-face education and written materials. Osteoporosis knowledge was assessed using the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool at baseline and discharge. Nurses' time spent on health education was self-recorded during each intervention session and aggregated across sessions. Adherence to disease management was assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge via telephone using Likert-scale questionnaires. The reliability of OPBot responses was evaluated by 2 clinician assessors using a 5-point Likert scale, with interrater agreement calculated using Cohen κ. Group comparisons were conducted using 2-tailed independent t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests, and adherence outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects models.
resultsA total of 100 participants were randomized; 12% (12/100) were excluded due to loss to follow-up, refusal of the second knowledge assessment, or death, leaving 88% (88/100) participants for analysis (n=45, 51.1% in the OPBot group and n=43, 48.9% in the control group). The OPBot group showed significantly higher postintervention knowledge scores than the control group (median 80.0, IQR 70.0-89.0 vs median 75.0, IQR 65.5-80.0; P=.01). Nurses in the OPBot group spent lesser time on SME than those in the control group (median 5.0, IQR 2.0-17.0 vs median 23.0, IQR 20.0-25.0 minutes; P<.001). For adherence outcomes, a significant group×time interaction was observed for calcium supplement intake (odds ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.06; P=.02), indicating differing adherence trajectories over time. The OPBot group also showed higher odds of consuming calcium-rich foods across time points (odds ratio 2.87, 95% CI 1.04-7.89; nominal P=.04), although this association did not remain significant after Holm correction. No significant effects were observed for sun exposure (P=.56), exercise (P=.79), or total adherence scores (P=.33). In the question-and-answer module, most OPBot responses were rated as highly reliable 89.4% (76/85), with high interrater agreement (Cohen κ=0.83).
conclusionsLLM-based chatbots specifically designed for osteoporosis SME may improve patient knowledge, supporting adherence behaviors, and reducing healthcare workload. However, further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.