Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42229960›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Implementation of a hospital deprescribing behaviour change intervention, the CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER) trial: a process evaluation protocol.

Jacqueline M Martin-Kerry, Debi Bhattacharya, Johanna Taylor, Ian Kellar, Bethany Atkins, Charlotte E L Jones, Elizabeth M Bywater-Florance, Victoria L Keevil, Allan B Clark, David John Wright and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jacqueline M Martin-KerrySchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK jackie.martin-kerry@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9299-1360
Debi BhattacharyaSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-7453
Johanna TaylorDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5898-0900
Ian KellarSchool of Psychology, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1608-5216
Bethany AtkinsSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Charlotte E L JonesSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Elizabeth M Bywater-FloranceSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Victoria L KeevilDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Allan B ClarkNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
David John WrightSchool of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3690-9593
David Phillip AlldredSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2525-4854
Sion ScottSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7669-0632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProactive deprescribing is the process of stopping a medicine and comprises four steps: (1) identify a patient for potential stop of a medicine, (2) evaluate a patient for potential stop of a medicine, (3) stop a medicine and (4) monitor after stopping.The CHARMER (CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review) trial is a stepped-wedge design to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a behaviour change intervention to increase proactive deprescribing in hospitals. The CHARMER intervention comprises a deprescribing action plan, deprescribing briefings, videos of successful deprescribing consultations, deprescribing case studies workshop and a deprescribing performance dashboard. The process evaluation will explore trial processes, CHARMER intervention implementation, CHARMER behavioural mechanisms of action and contextual factors influencing these aspects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The convergent parallel design process evaluation will follow the UK Medical Research Council guidance. We will interview: staff involved in CHARMER implementation, geriatricians and pharmacists who receive the intervention and research delivery staff involved in patient/carer recruitment and data collection. We will also interview patients/carers and primary care practitioners. Interviews will be supplemented with recordings of implementation activities and completed implementation manuals. Questionnaires will capture the extent to which the four proactive deprescribing steps are enacted by intervention recipients, measure the behavioural mechanisms by which the CHARMER intervention operates and capture the patient experience of proactive deprescribing. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically and then mapped to Normalisation Process Theory to explore implementation and the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore behaviour change. Most quantitative data will be analysed descriptively; however, changes in staff questionnaire responses preintervention and postintervention will be analysed using a Mann-Whitney test. We will triangulate qualitative and quantitative findings to explain intervention effects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical and governance approvals have been obtained by the Wales 2 Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority, respectively. The dissemination strategy will be underpinned by the evidence-based Guide to Disseminating Research (GuiDiR) targeting healthcare practitioners, policy makers and patient-facing organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13248281.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsGeriatriciansMedication ReviewAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHospitalsHumansResearch DesignUnited KingdomBehaviorGERIATRIC MEDICINEHospitalsPharmacistsPhysiciansPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID42229960
PMCPMC13239467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.