ReviewHormones (Athens, Greece)2026
Bone health in gender-diverse individuals: current challenges and future directions.
Review in Hormones (Athens, Greece), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) alters sex-steroid exposure, raising important questions about skeletal health in transgender and gender-diverse populations. Evidence remains fragmented and centred on areal bone mineral density (BMD), with sparse fracture data and little integration of other parameters such as muscle. This narrative review synthesises evidence on skeletal health in transgender individuals, bone density, fracture risk and the muscle-bone unit, bone health screening, and effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists during adolescence.
methodsWe performed a narrative review of clinical studies and guidelines addressing BMD, fractures, puberty suppression, and GAHT in transgender populations, prioritising clinically relevant data.
resultsMultiple cohorts report low pre-GAHT BMD, particularly in individuals assigned-male-at-birth (AMAB), likely reflecting minority stress, low physical activity, suboptimal vitamin D status, and sedentary lifestyles. Adequately dosed GAHT generally maintains or modestly improves BMD, especially in individuals assigned-female-at-birth (AFAB) on testosterone, while modest lumbar spine deficits may persist in some AMAB individuals. Fracture data are limited but reassuring. In adolescents, GnRH-agonists predictably reduce BMD Z-scores during hormonal suppression, with partial recovery after GAHT-initiation. However, implications for peak bone mass remain uncertain. Emerging evidence favours risk-stratified rather than universal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening, alongside optimisation of GAHT, nutrition, and physical activity.
conclusionsCurrent evidence does not indicate an increased skeletal risk when GAHT is appropriately managed. Pre-existing vulnerabilities appear central to bone health risk stratification, underscoring the need for risk-based care that integrates bone parameters alongside non-skeletal factors, such as muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42230484What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.