ArticleNature communications2026
Automatic selection of the best neural architecture for time series forecasting.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automatic selection of the best neural architecture for time series forecasting.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time series forecasting is essential across domains such as healthcare, energy, and climate modeling. While models like LSTMs, GRUs, Transformers, and State-Space Models (SSMs) have become widely used, selecting the optimal architecture remains unclear. We propose an automated framework that systematically designs hybrid architectures by combining LSTM, GRU, attention, and SSM modules. Our approach uses multi-objective optimization to explore combinations and orderings of blocks, yielding Pareto-optimal architectures that balance user-defined trade-offs among objectives. A preference function selects the most suitable model for a given application. Moreover, two sampling-based iterative procedures for Pareto-front exploration are introduced, which reduces the total training cost by nearly eightfold. Across four real-world benchmarks, our framework reveals that simple models excel in speed, while hybrid compositions dominate when balancing accuracy and complexity. Our findings challenge the notion of a universally superior neural architecture, emphasizing instead the value of data- and objective-driven design in time series forecasting.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.