Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230744›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting knowledge of cervical cancer screening among reproductive-age women in sub-saharan africa using machine learning algorithms.

Nebebe Demis Baykemagn, Gebrie Getu Alemu, Makda Fekadie Tewelgne, Alemu Teshale Bicha, Tirualem Zeleke Yehuala, Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke, Habtamu Wagnew Abuhay, Miteku Andualem Limenih

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nebebe Demis BaykemagnDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. nebebe2@gmail.com.
Gebrie Getu AlemuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Makda Fekadie TewelgneDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Alemu Teshale BichaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tirualem Zeleke YehualaDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Mekuriaw Nibret AwekeDepartment of Human Nutrition, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Wagnew AbuhayDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Miteku Andualem LimenihDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa faces twice the incidence and up to fifteen times the fatality rate of cervical cancer compared to developed countries. Screening coverage remains low at 7-25.3%, far below the WHO target of 70%. Increasing women's knowledge about cervical cancer screening is crucial for improving uptake and reducing this high burden. The study was conducted among 50,584 reproductive-age women across seven Sub-Saharan African countries. A combination of filter and wrapper methods was applied for feature selection. Data preprocessing and management were performed using Stata version 17 and Python (Colab, version 3.10.2). MinMaxScaler, StandardScaler, and RobustScaler were applied to normalize variable ranges. One-hot encoding was used for nominal categories, and ordinal encoding was applied for features with an inherent order. The dataset was split using an 80; 20 (40,467: 10,117) ratio for training and testing. Eight algorithms were selected for model training and development, including Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Gradient Boosting (GB). Hyperparameter tuning was performed for XGBoost and LightGBM. Model performance was evaluated using Accuracy, AUC, F1 Score, Recall, and Precision. The XGBoost algorithm outperformed the other models, achieving an accuracy of 84%, an AUC of 82%, an F1 score of 83%, a recall of 82%, and a precision of 84%. Overall, 56% of reproductive-age women demonstrated good knowledge of cervical cancer screening. HIV status, educational status, media exposure, maternal age, health status, antenatal care attendance, wealth status, occupation, autonomy, place of delivery, distance to health facility, marital status, and fertility were identified as the top predictors of knowledge of cervical cancer screening. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening was low, at 56%, compared with the WHO target of 70%. Strengthen community-based educational programs through mass media, reinforce health education during antenatal care (ANC) follow-up and HIV programs, and implement strategies that promote women's autonomy, education, and economic empowerment are recommended.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMachine LearningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAfrica South of the SaharaBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsRandom ForestSub-Saharan African PeopleYoung AdultCervical Cancer ScreeningKnowledge of Cervical CancerMachine LearningReproductive-Age WomenSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID42230744
PMCPMC13462692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.