ArticleCommunications biology2026
Endothelial cell-specific DNA methylation alterations in breast cancer.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation alterations are well-established contributors to carcinogenesis, yet, in the tumor microenvironment (TME), patterns of lineage and cell-specific methylation alterations are not well understood. Single-cell DNA methylation profiling in the TME is limited by technical challenges and high costs. Here, we use bulk DNA methylation, cell type deconvolution (HiTIMED), and an interaction testing framework (CellDMC) to identify reproducible, computationally inferred lineage-specific epigenetic alterations in the TME supported by orthogonal data sources. Tumor endothelial cells (TECs), critical regulators of angiogenesis, vascular permeability, and immune cell trafficking, acquire structural and functional abnormalities that promote tumor growth. We hypothesize that TECs have altered DNA methylation compared with endothelial cells in non-tumor tissues. In genome-scale methylation data from discovery and validation datasets (tumor n = 1071; non-tumor n = 415), we identify and validate >4500 TEC-specific CpGs with altered methylation, many mapping to genes involved in angiogenesis and endothelial function. Integration with gene expression data indicates that TEC-specific methylation alterations may reprogram transcriptional networks controlling angiogenesis. High-resolution, cell lineage-specific epigenetic landscapes can be inferred from bulk methylation data, implicating TEC-specific DNA methylation alterations as potential drivers of cancer angiogenesis and vascular dysfunction and providing a framework for future mechanistic and translational studies of the tumor vasculature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.