ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
A wearable non-invasive sonogenetic pacemaker.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac pacemakers are critical for treating heart rhythm disorders, but traditional implants are associated with great risks and complications owing to their invasive nature. Here we introduce a wearable non-invasive ultrasound pacemaker (NUP) that activates engineered sonogenetic ion channels (MscL-G22S) to modulate cardiomyocytes, achieving spatiotemporally controlled precise cardiac pacing. In vitro studies on transfected human cardiomyocytes demonstrated synchronized calcium signalling and controlled responses to ultrasound stimulation. In vivo experiments in rats showed non-invasive pacing with high spatial precision (less than 1 mm) and frequency control (up to 9 Hz) stimulations in different heart chambers, restoring sinus rhythm in arrhythmic models. We validated long-term safety during daily activities in rats over 8 months. To assess translational potential, we show the genetic safety of NUP and demonstrated its feasibility for human-scale applications in ex vivo porcine models. With its compact, wearable design and imaging-guided stimulation, the NUP offers a non-invasive, safe and adaptable pacemaker solution for cardiac rhythm management.
Identifiers
42230973What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.