ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Health behavior risk prediction in metabolic syndrome patients: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model via multisource heterogeneous data integration.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) represents a major public health challenge in rural populations, particularly in resource-limited regions such as southern Xinjiang, China. Unhealthy behaviors serve as key modifiable drivers of MetS progression; however, existing models fail to integrate psychosocial determinants within a comprehensive social ecological framework. Interpretable machine learning (ML) presents an opportunity to address this gap by identifying potentially modifiable predictive factors through multisource data integration.
objectiveTo develop and validate an interpretable ML model that integrates biomedical, psychological, and social data for predicting health behavior risk in MetS patients and exploring candidate predictive factors for future intervention research.
methodsIn a cross-sectional study of 906 MetS patients from southern Xinjiang, China, six core predictors were sequentially identified through Lasso regression and subsequent logistic regression. Eight ML models were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with interpretability enhanced by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsXGBoost achieved optimal performance (AUC = 0.852, sensitivity = 0.865, specificity = 0.908). DCA confirmed clinical utility across threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis demonstrated that perceived stress ranked as the top predictor for model output, with perceived stress, self-efficacy, and social support jointly forming a core psychosocial cluster associated with health behavior risk, showing greater predictive importance than biomedical indicators. A statistical inflection range of TC (4.0-5.2mmol/L) was suggestively linked to dual metabolic-neurobehavioral stabilization.
conclusionsThis validated interpretable ML model highlights psychosocial factors as central to health behavior risk in MetS patients. The identified thresholds provide data support for potential precision-based interventions and offer insights for chronic disease management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.