Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42232902›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Nutrient-rich environments drive microbiome restructuring and mucus shedding in a coastal cnidarian.

Tim Lachnit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tim LachnitZoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anthropogenic nutrient enrichment is increasing in coastal ecosystems, yet its effects on host-microbe interactions and animal fitness remain insufficiently understood. This study investigates how elevated dissolved nutrient availability and differing nutrient compositions influence microbiome structure and host responses in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis. Methods: We experimentally enriched seawater with either a complex organic nutrient source or a protein-rich substrate. We then assessed resulting changes in microbiome composition, host behavior (including mucus shedding), and population growth. Results: Nutrient enrichment caused substantial restructuring of the host-associated microbiome, characterized by reduced diversity and increased dominance of fast-growing bacterial taxa. Community composition differed depending on nutrient type. Enriched conditions also triggered increased ectodermal mucus shedding, which physically removed surface-associated microbes. Copiotrophic taxa that proliferated under nutrient enrichment were disproportionately represented in shed mucus relative to whole polyps, suggesting spatial structuring of microbial associations with host surfaces. While this response limited microbial overgrowth, it imposed significant physiological costs, leading to reduced or negative population growth. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that nutrient enrichment alters host-associated microbiomes and identify mucus shedding as a host-mediated mechanism for microbial regulation. Although effective, this response carries substantial fitness costs, highlighting a trade-off between microbial control and host performance. This study provides mechanistic insight into how eutrophication may drive microbiome restructuring and impact host physiology in coastal cnidarians.

Indexed as

dysbiosiseutrophicationhost defensehost–microbe interactionimbalance microbiotamicrobiomemucus shedding

Identifiers

PMID42232902
PMCPMC13223050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.