ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Glycosylation gene-based molecular recognition model for diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) represents a significant public health challenge, with the potential to cause blindness and escalate healthcare costs, yet current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches remain insufficient. This study investigated the role of glycosylation-related differentially expressed genes (GRDEGs) in DR to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Through analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets using differential expression analysis, functional enrichment, and machine learning, we identified 39 GRDEGs-including RPS23, VCAN, and ST8SIA4-that play significant roles in DR pathogenesis. These genes were enriched in biological processes such as wound healing and sphingolipid metabolism, as well as cancer-related pathways. Immune infiltration analysis revealed distinct patterns and correlations between immune cell types and GRDEGs, suggesting immune microenvironment involvement in DR progression. External validation using an independent blood dataset demonstrated moderate discriminatory performance (AUC 0.7-0.9), though this cross-tissue comparison should be interpreted as exploratory evidence of partial gene expression consistency rather than confirmation of biological mechanisms or clinical utility. Given the limited sample size and group imbalances in the discovery cohort, these results constitute proof-of-concept findings requiring validation in larger, balanced populations. Future research should focus on functional validation of identified GRDEGs and integration of the molecular recognition model into clinical workflows to enable proactive DR management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.