ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
The complexities of athlete development in North American professional sport.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the number of roles and positions within professional sport organizations dedicated to athlete development grows, coaches and other interest-holders continue to look to empirical evidence to guide their approaches and inform decision-making. Unfortunately, evidence to date is limited, leaving practitioners wondering how they can best support and make positive change in the athletes under their care, especially when these athletes are typically adults and at the most elite stages of their sporting careers. Using a narrative review approach, this work draws from areas within sport science including talent development, research methods, and athlete support to highlight some of the contemporary issues faced by practitioners in these roles. The main challenges identified include (a) definitional ambiguity, (b) measurement and analysis challenges, (c) restrictive theoretical modeling, and (d) implementation science barriers. Overall, based on the limited, high-quality, empirical evidence to date, decisions on what is "best" for professional athletes at this stage of their careers remains elusive. Caution should be taken when making assumptions, and applying a "one size fits all approach" for athlete development in early adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.