Evidence mapPaperPMID 42233152Full record

ReviewInfection prevention in practice2026

Antibiotic utilization in outpatient and inpatient hospitals in Zambia: a systematic review, key findings and public health implications.

L Siachalinga, N Nyirenda, M Hachalinga, R K Mutati, W Mufwambi, A C Kalungia, B Godman, H Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L SiachalingaSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, 58 Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
N NyirendaDepartment of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
M HachalingaZambia Medicines Regulatory Authority, Department of Marketing Authorisation, Head Office, Plot No.2350/M, Off Kenneth Kaunda International Airport Road, Lusaka, Zambia.
R K MutatiDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
W MufwambiDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
A C KalungiaDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, Zambia.
B GodmanDivision of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.
H KimSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, 58 Parklands Drive, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to document current antibiotic utilization patterns among Zambian hospitals to inform Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) policies and practices to help reduce AMR. Published literature was searched from PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar from 1 January 2000 to 13 March 2025. Search terms included antibiotics, utilization, intervention, stewardship and hospital while applying appropriate Boolean Operators. The review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The search retrieved 913 studies; 19 studies were included in the final analysis, including 17 quantitative descriptive studies and two non-randomized controlled studies. The overall quality of the included studies was good (≥75%). Antibiotic use prevalence was between 50.3% - 82.5% with a pooled estimate of 67.0%, 95% CI (60-73). The highest prevalence were Access antibiotics (34.2%-84.0%). Frequently prescribed antibiotics belonged to the Watch group in 8 out of 11 studies. Two (10.5%) studies assessed antibiotic prescribing appropriateness, overall inappropriateness was 67.0% in one study, while the other study reported appropriateness over 95% across assessed indicators. In 10 studies that reported at least one quality indicator for antibiotic use, guideline compliance was the most reported with compliance ranging from 27.0% to 58.1%. Two studies that evaluated the impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) on antibiotic use reported improvement in use pre to post ASP. In conclusion, despite structural challenges in diagnostics and guideline adherence, sustained multifaceted AMS implementation and integration of the WHO AWaRe framework are improving prescribing patterns and providing a pathway to curb antimicrobial resistance in Zambia.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial stewardshipAntimicrobial utilizationAppropriatenessPrevalenceQuality indicators

Identifiers

PMID42233152
PMCPMC13223719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.