ReviewInfection prevention in practice2026
Antibiotic utilization in outpatient and inpatient hospitals in Zambia: a systematic review, key findings and public health implications.
Review in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aimed to document current antibiotic utilization patterns among Zambian hospitals to inform Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) policies and practices to help reduce AMR. Published literature was searched from PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar from 1 January 2000 to 13 March 2025. Search terms included antibiotics, utilization, intervention, stewardship and hospital while applying appropriate Boolean Operators. The review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The search retrieved 913 studies; 19 studies were included in the final analysis, including 17 quantitative descriptive studies and two non-randomized controlled studies. The overall quality of the included studies was good (≥75%). Antibiotic use prevalence was between 50.3% - 82.5% with a pooled estimate of 67.0%, 95% CI (60-73). The highest prevalence were Access antibiotics (34.2%-84.0%). Frequently prescribed antibiotics belonged to the Watch group in 8 out of 11 studies. Two (10.5%) studies assessed antibiotic prescribing appropriateness, overall inappropriateness was 67.0% in one study, while the other study reported appropriateness over 95% across assessed indicators. In 10 studies that reported at least one quality indicator for antibiotic use, guideline compliance was the most reported with compliance ranging from 27.0% to 58.1%. Two studies that evaluated the impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) on antibiotic use reported improvement in use pre to post ASP. In conclusion, despite structural challenges in diagnostics and guideline adherence, sustained multifaceted AMS implementation and integration of the WHO AWaRe framework are improving prescribing patterns and providing a pathway to curb antimicrobial resistance in Zambia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.