ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2026
Outcome-specific risk factors challenge universal dementia prevention priorities: Findings from the Egyptian Dementia Network Registry.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDementia prevention targets modifiable factors from high-income cohorts, but most studies conflate dementia status and cognitive performance, distinct outcomes with potentially different outcomes. This distinction is critical to disentangle in resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries, where resource prioritization requires context-specific evidence.
methodsCross-sectional analysis of 660 adults with dementia/mild cognitive impairment from the Egyptian Dementia Network registry (2022 to 2025). Parallel logistic/linear regression models identified factors associated with dementia status versus continuous Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, comparing determinants across outcomes.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 68 years, 51% were male, and 81% had a primary education. Multivariable models showed only college education (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10 to 0.86) and social inactivity (OR 3.00, 95% CI: 1.27 to 7.08) associated with dementia status. Eight factors (age, diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol, family history, apolipoprotein ε4, body mass index, and sex; all p < 0.05) strongly predicted MMSE but not diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Dementia diagnosis and cognitive performance show mechanistically distinct cross-sectional associations. LMICs should prioritize education/social engagement for dementia prevention, framing vascular-metabolic management as cognitive maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.