SynthesisToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2026
Airborne contaminant exposure and bone development: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Air pollution, including particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) and airborne metals (Cd, Hg, As, Pb) are a systemic health hazard, but osteotoxic effects remain underrecognized. We systematically synthesized human, animal, and in vitro evidence on airborne contaminants and outcomes to skeletal health. Following Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT) guidance, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar (2014-2024; final search November 24, 2024) for English-language studies relating PM or airborne metals to skeletal outcomes, excluding studies limited to adult occupational exposures, age-related bone disease, or non-peer-reviewed reports. Studies were screened and data extracted in Covidence. Risk of bias was assessed using tools from the Quality Assessment and Risk of Bias Tool Repository, and certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE. We used a random-effects meta-analyses model to estimate relative risks (RRs) interpreted as directional consistency hazards for bone loss, impaired osteoblast differentiation, enhanced osteoclast activity, bone marrow adiposity, epigenetic changes, and altered bone microarchitecture. Fifty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Across outcomes, meta-analyses showed higher hazard risk in exposed versus control groups, with RRs ranging from 7 to 10; for example, bone loss (RR 7.12, 95% CI 4.20-12.06) and altered bone microarchitecture (RR 10.28, 95% CI 4.67-22.61). Epidemiologic and experimental evidence may implicate oxidative stress, inflammation, and epigenetic dysregulation as key mechanisms. Overall certainty was low to moderate due to residual confounding, exposure misclassification, and heterogeneity. Growing evidence indicates that airborne PM and metals adversely affect bone health, particularly during critical developmental windows, underscoring the need to integrate skeletal endpoints into health assessment and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.