Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233442›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2026

Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in the Theta Band Prevents Recall of the Initial Fear Association After Extinction Training.

Giorgi Batsikadze, Zsofia Spisak, Philippe Zeidan, Michael Klein, Enzo Nio, Thomas M Ernst, Nicolas Diekmann, Sophia Göricke, Sen Cheng, Christian J Merz and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Giorgi BatsikadzeDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0517-0119
Zsofia SpisakDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Philippe ZeidanDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michael KleinDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Enzo NioDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Thomas M ErnstDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Nicolas DiekmannInstitute for Neural Computation, Faculty of Computer Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sophia GörickeInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Sen ChengInstitute for Neural Computation, Faculty of Computer Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christian J MerzRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Psychology, Bochum, Germany.
Fatemeh YavariDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Michael A NitscheDepartment of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany.
Andreas ThiemeDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-8601
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 316803389Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FU356/12-2University Medicine Essen Clinician Scientist Academy (UMEA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the neural network underlying fear extinction has been extensively studied, the cerebellum's role has received little attention - despite its well-established involvement in associative learning. Our study therefore aimed to provide additional evidence that the cerebellum is part of the circuitry supporting fear-extinction processes, and to get a better understanding of how the cerebellum may contribute to fear extinction learning. In this study, 6 Hz cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (ctACS) or sham stimulation was applied during extinction training in a two-day differential fear conditioning paradigm in young, healthy participants undergoing 3T fMRI, using a double-blind randomized design. Acquisition and extinction training occurred on day 1, followed by extinction recall on day 2. Skin conductance responses showed that 6 Hz ctACS applied during extinction training reduced spontaneous fear recovery during recall. During extinction training, differential fMRI activation (CS+ > CS-) was significantly higher in the occipital cortex in the verum compared to the sham group. During recall, differential fMRI activation was significantly higher in the precentral gyrus in the sham compared to the verum group at the time the aversive unconditioned response (US) was expected but did not occur. Furthermore, in recall, parametric modulation based on trial-by-trial model-derived prediction errors for no-US events revealed significantly higher activation in frontal cortical areas, including the anterior cingulate cortex, and parietal cortical areas in the sham compared to the verum group. Volume of interest analyses showed significantly higher beta values towards the CS+ compared to the CS- in the sham group, but not in the verum group in the right insula related to the prediction of the US and its unexpected omission in early recall. Although direct stimulation effects cannot be ruled out, 6 Hz ctACS-related increases in activation in visual regions during extinction training may indicate enhanced attention to CS-related visual and/or contextual cues. Furthermore, 6 Hz ctACS facilitated the downregulation of brain regions involved in fear conditioning during recall, potentially reducing spontaneous recovery. Future studies are warranted to further evaluate whether enhancement of cerebellar theta oscillations can help to stabilize extinction effects and therefore support exposure therapy.

Indexed as

CerebellumExtinction, PsychologicalFearMental RecallTheta RhythmTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultAssociation LearningBrain MappingConditioning, ClassicalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleassociative learningaversive conditioningfear conditioningfear prediction errorfMRInon‐invasive brain stimulationtranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42233442
PMCPMC13239637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.