Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42233887›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026

Simultaneous Automated Insect Monitoring Across a Remote Tropical Elevation Gradient With Mothbox.

Hubert A Szczygieł, Andrew Quitmeyer, Brianna Johns, Daisy H Dent, Yash Sondhi, Daniel Zuleta, Alexandre Antonelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hubert A SzczygiełDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 7B, 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4290-4660
Andrew QuitmeyerDigital Naturalism Laboratories, Sibert Ave 123B, 0801, Gamboa, Colón Province, Panama.
Brianna JohnsSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Daisy H DentSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, República de Panamá.
Yash SondhiCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biology, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Daniel ZuletaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 7B, 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden.
Alexandre AntonelliDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 7B, 413 90 Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1842-9297

Funding

American Museum of Natural HistorySwedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental ResearchSwedish Research Council 2024-04,303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect declines have been recorded in many parts of the world, however, the vast majority of taxa and ecosystems, particularly in the tropics, remain poorly documented. Monitoring insects in the tropics is challenging due to their immense diversity, and the limited resources for research. It is therefore crucial to maximally leverage existing scientific capacity. In complement to DNA-based approaches, or as an alternative that bypasses some of their shortcomings, automated, passive insect monitoring devices are a new tool that can assess insect diversity with standardization and scalability. An additional benefit of insect monitoring devices is the ability to program simultaneous, autonomous monitoring in remote regions that would be very resource intensive to monitor with traditional methodologies. Here, we describe the results of an insect monitoring expedition in Cerro Hoya National Park, Panama, which utilized 19 Mothboxes (automated light traps) deployed across an elevation gradient from 119 to 1534 m above sea level. Images were processed by the Mothbot computer vision system and manually validated at order level. For further validation, we sorted one order, - Coleoptera (beetles), to the level of morphospecies. Three days of sampling yielded 64,352 insect detections representing 17 orders. Within the Coleoptera, we detected 26 families and 142 species. Species richness and Shannon diversity decreased with increasing elevation, despite signs of anthropogenic disturbance at lower elevations. The number of detections (a proxy for activity patterns and abundance) also decreased with elevation except for the highest sampling points. Across all elevations, insect activity was greatest at the beginning of the night, with 40% of all insect detections occurring within an hour and a half of sunset, however trends differed between taxonomic groups. This study highlights the potential for automated insect monitors to enable large-scale insect monitoring in remote locations with small teams. Automated insect monitoring does not replace entomologists, but rather greatly expands their capacity for monitoring insect diversity at scale.

Indexed as

BiodiversityInsectaAltitudeAnimalsPanamaTropical Climate

Identifiers

PMID42233887
PMCPMC13289736

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.