ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Artificial intelligence in paediatric chest imaging: applications, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prompting the future: artificial intelligence in pediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPaediatric chest imaging is central to diagnosing respiratory and cardiopulmonary disease, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where pneumonia remains a leading cause of childhood mortality and radiology expertise is scarce. Artificial intelligence (AI) could expand access, standardise quality and support task-shifting in these "diagnostic deserts," yet most systems are trained and validated on adult datasets from high-income settings, and paediatric radiographs form only a small minority of major public training cohorts - raising concerns about safety, generalisability and equity when such models are deployed in children.
objectiveTo synthesise current applications of AI across paediatric chest radiography, lung ultrasound, computed tomography and MRI, with emphasis on LMIC workflows, and to define what is required for safe, paediatric-specific deployment. MATERIALS AND
methodsNarrative/pictorial review of the published literature, complemented by the authors' real-world evaluation of a generalist vision-language model (MedGemma) on adult and paediatric chest radiographs, illustrated with representative clinical cases.
resultsBeyond diagnosis, AI shows potential in quality assurance, lung-ultrasound guidance and multilingual reporting. Real-world experience from CAD4Kids and from MedGemma's evaluation - including critical failures in detecting pericardial effusion and tuberculosis without explicit clinical context - illustrates common failure modes and the ethical implications of domain shift. Key challenges include infrastructure constraints, dataset scarcity and the need for age-aware, explainable models.
conclusionRather than adapting adult systems, future tools must be designed from inception for children and the environments in which they live, prioritising federated learning, multimodal integration, robust validation across age strata and multilingual communication with caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.