Evidence mapPaperPMID 42234129Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026

Inpatient cardiac computed tomography angiography in Germany between 2005 and 2023: a nationwide registry study.

Katharina A Riedl, Bianca Strauß, Alexander Lenz, Isabel Molwitz, Jennifer Erley, Rickmer Braren, Stefan Blankenberg, Johannes T Neumann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katharina A RiedlDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Bianca StraußDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alexander LenzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabel MolwitzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jennifer ErleyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Rickmer BrarenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan BlankenbergDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes T NeumannDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. j.neumann@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9478-2757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a non-invasive imaging method, which enables detailed evaluation of the cardiac anatomy and the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The diagnostic quality and availability improved, while data on the actual use of CCTA is sparse. We aimed to evaluate in-hospital CCTA utilization, the related diagnoses, and procedures in Germany in recent years.

methodsData from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany on all in-hospital CCTA cases between 2005 and 2023 was used. Clinical diagnoses, procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. In subgroup analyses, we evaluated the use of CCTA among all cases with the primary diagnosis of CAD.

resultsA total of 475,740 cases (median age 72 [60, 80] years, 43.8% females) underwent CCTA. The most common primary diagnoses of the in-hospital CCTA scans were aortic valve diseases (28.7%), atrial fibrillation and flutter (19.5%), and CAD (16.4%). The majority of CCTA scans was performed in urban hospitals (59.3%). Over time, the number of CCTA substantially increased (factor 11). Among all cases with the primary diagnosis CAD (n = 12,153,473), a minority of 78,199 (0.6%) underwent CCTA scans. Among CAD, younger patients and more females received a CCTA scan and in these cases less invasive coronary angiographies and interventions were performed.

conclusionsCCTA is increasingly used in cardiovascular care. Inpatient CCTA scans were performed for the evaluation of aortic valve diseases, atrial fibrillation and flutter and CAD.

Indexed as

Cardiac computed tomographyCCTACoronary artery diseaseIn-hospital

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.