SynthesisSurgery today2026
Preoperative risk factors for postoperative pneumonia in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tailor-made approach for ambulatory open groin hernia repair: our experience of over 7000 cases.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative pneumonia is a critical problem after esophagectomy. This systematic review examined overall risk factors for pneumonia after esophagectomy comprehensively and compared their relative impact on patients with esophageal cancer. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science in November, 2024, and included cohort studies on esophageal neoplasms, esophagectomy, pneumonia, and risk factors in this review. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The search yielded 3,323 records, among which 60 studies were eligible. The mean patient age ranged from 60.3 years to 73.9 years and the pneumonia incidence ranged from 2.0% to 61.5%. Thirty-seven risk factors were reported. By predefined levels of significance, age and smoking status were very strong (≥10 significant studies and >50% of all studies), and sarcopenia, forced expiratory volume (FEV), oral status, and physical frailty were strong (6-9 significant studies and >50% of all studies). Regarding the certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, age, smoking status, sarcopenia, FEV, and physical frailty were rated as having moderate certainty, and oral status was rated as having low certainty. Based on pooled odds ratios (random-effects models) the highest-ranked factors were physical frailty (OR: 5.170, 95% CI: 2.430-11.020), sarcopenia (OR: 2.790, 95% CI: 1.600-4.860), and FEV (OR: 2.730, 95% CI: 1.500-4.960).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42234145What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.