Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42234370›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026

Development and validation of a machine learning-based clinical decision support tool for stratifying intravenous medication risk in hospitalized patients with heart failure.

Yang Yang, ZeJie Xu, Yu Peilin, Haidong Li, Hongmei Wang, Xuefeng Shan

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang YangHealth Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
ZeJie XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 9 of Shuangxing Avenue, Bishan District, Chongqing, 402760, China.
Yu PeilinHealth Management Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Haidong LiDepartment of Science and Technology Education and Foreign Affairs, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 426, Songshi North Road, Yubei District, Chongqing City, China.
Hongmei WangDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1, Youyi Road, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Xuefeng ShanDepartment of Pharmacy, Bishan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 9 of Shuangxing Avenue, Bishan District, Chongqing, 402760, China. 83846674@qq.com.

Funding

Medical Project of Chongqing Municipal Health Commission 2026WSJK010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) frequently receive multiple high-risk intravenous (IV) medications, placing them at a substantial risk of clinically significant drug-related problems (DRPs). Timely severity-based stratification of IV medication-related risks remains challenging, particularly in the context of complex regimens and organ dysfunction.

aimTo develop and externally validate a clinically applicable machine learning-based stratification tool for classifying IV medication-related risk severity in hospitalized patients with HF and to support pharmacist-led medication safety management through a web-based clinical decision support tool.

methodThis multicenter retrospective study included 1,884 adult patients hospitalized with HF from seven tertiary hospitals, with an independent external validation cohort of 100 patients. IV medication-related DRPs were identified and classified by senior clinical pharmacists using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) DRP classification (version 9.1) and stratified by severity using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) index. Medication risk severity (levels C-F) was used as a multiclass stratification outcome. Candidate clinical and medication-related variables reflecting patient characteristics, organ function, and medication burden were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and six machine learning algorithms for multiclass risk stratification were developed and compared.

resultsOverall, 1405 patients (74.6%) experienced at least one IV medication-related DRP, with treatment safety problems predominating. Eleven clinically interpretable predictors, including neutrophil percentage, fibrinogen, serum albumin, and creatinine clearance were retained in the final models. In internal validation, the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.934), whereas in external validation, the artificial neural network (ANN) demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.921). Considering its consistent performance across datasets, ANN was selected as the final model, achieving AUC of 0.889 and 0.921 in the internal and external validation, respectively. Based on this model, a web-based clinical decision support tool was developed to provide individualized IV medication risk stratification at the point-of-care.

conclusionA machine learning-based clinical decision support tool that incorporates routinely available clinical and medication-related variables can accurately stratify IV medication-related risk severity in hospitalized patients with HF.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHeart FailureMachine LearningAdministration, IntravenousAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentClinical decision supportClinical pharmacyDrug-related problemsHeart failureIntravenous medication safetyMachine learningRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42234370
PMCPMC13369701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.