ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Development and validation of a machine learning-based clinical decision support tool for stratifying intravenous medication risk in hospitalized patients with heart failure.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) frequently receive multiple high-risk intravenous (IV) medications, placing them at a substantial risk of clinically significant drug-related problems (DRPs). Timely severity-based stratification of IV medication-related risks remains challenging, particularly in the context of complex regimens and organ dysfunction.
aimTo develop and externally validate a clinically applicable machine learning-based stratification tool for classifying IV medication-related risk severity in hospitalized patients with HF and to support pharmacist-led medication safety management through a web-based clinical decision support tool.
methodThis multicenter retrospective study included 1,884 adult patients hospitalized with HF from seven tertiary hospitals, with an independent external validation cohort of 100 patients. IV medication-related DRPs were identified and classified by senior clinical pharmacists using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) DRP classification (version 9.1) and stratified by severity using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) index. Medication risk severity (levels C-F) was used as a multiclass stratification outcome. Candidate clinical and medication-related variables reflecting patient characteristics, organ function, and medication burden were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and six machine learning algorithms for multiclass risk stratification were developed and compared.
resultsOverall, 1405 patients (74.6%) experienced at least one IV medication-related DRP, with treatment safety problems predominating. Eleven clinically interpretable predictors, including neutrophil percentage, fibrinogen, serum albumin, and creatinine clearance were retained in the final models. In internal validation, the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.934), whereas in external validation, the artificial neural network (ANN) demonstrated the best performance (AUC = 0.921). Considering its consistent performance across datasets, ANN was selected as the final model, achieving AUC of 0.889 and 0.921 in the internal and external validation, respectively. Based on this model, a web-based clinical decision support tool was developed to provide individualized IV medication risk stratification at the point-of-care.
conclusionA machine learning-based clinical decision support tool that incorporates routinely available clinical and medication-related variables can accurately stratify IV medication-related risk severity in hospitalized patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.