ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Double burden of malnutrition and its associated factors among adolescents aged (10-19) years in a rural district of Pakistan.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dietary Adequacy and Its Associated Factors Among Adolescents in a Rural District of Sindh.Nutrients · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The double burden of malnutrition (DBM) is a growing concern in Pakistan, particularly among children and adolescents. This study assessed the prevalence and determinants of DBM in a rural district of Tando Muhammad Khan (TMK) in Pakistan. A representative cross-sectional study was conducted in a rural district of TMK using multistage cluster sampling. A total of 1,304 households were surveyed, and one eligible adolescent per household was selected. Anthropometric measurements were taken to assess nutritional status based on WHO criteria. Data were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression with survey design adjustments, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Among 1,159 adolescents, the prevalence of underweight was 18.3% (95% CI: 15.0-20.0) and 4.2% were overweight/obese (95% CI: 3.0-5.0). The associated factors for underweight included working (AOR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01-2.50), no soap available/handwash supplies (AOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.99-2.20), inadequate sleep (AOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.34-2.59), and mild to moderate depression (AOR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.04-3.00). The protective factors were being female (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.80) and always eating between meals (AOR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.30-1.001). For overweight/obesity, snacking between meals was a risk factor (AOR = 2.00, 95% CI: 0.99-4.20), while larger family size was protective (AOR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.80). Addressing DBM requires integrated strategies that improve hygiene, support mental health, and promote healthy eating. Gender-sensitive education and access to clean water, sanitation, and diverse diets are essential for better adolescent health outcomes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.