ArticleScience advances2026
Dose-dependent hormone actions at estrogen receptor enhancers specify distinct molecular and biological outcomes.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adult women are typically exposed to 17β-estradiol (E2) concentrations of ~100 to 200 pM, yet most cell-based studies use 100 nM. We determined the molecular effects of E2 concentrations spanning six orders of magnitude (1 pM to 100 nM) in breast cancer cells. Estrogen receptor α (ERα) enhancers formed at low physiological doses of E2 (1 to 100 pM) are mechanistically distinct from those that form at high pharmacological doses (10 to 100 nM). They (i) form in open chromatin bound by FOXA1, (ii) are clustered within topologically associated domains, (iii) produce enhancer RNAs enriched with functional enhancer RNA regulatory motifs, and (iv) drive expression of proliferation genes with promoter-proximal paused RNA polymerase II and distinct co-regulator enrichment. Low-dose ERα enhancer usage is elevated in patients who have breast cancer with poor responses to aromatase inhibitors, likely as a continued response to low circulating levels of E2. Collectively, our results identify mechanistic differences between low- and high-dose ERα enhancers that specify distinct biological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.