ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2026
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Family-centered Empowerment Model, Collaborative Care Model and Motivational Interviewing on Blood Glucose Control and Nutritional Behaviors Based on BASNEF Model in Patients Attended to Rural Health Centers; A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the global burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the present study aims to compare the effectiveness of the family-centered empowerment model, collaborative care model, and motivational interviewing on blood glucose control and nutritional behaviors based on the BASNEF model.
methodsA single-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted among patients with T2DM referred to the Rural Health Centers in Gorgan city, Iran. A total of 120 patients were allocated into one of four groups: family-centered empowerment model (n = 30), collaborative care model (n = 30), motivational interviewing (n = 30), and control group (n = 30) using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Participants were blinded to group assignment, while outcome assessors (laboratory technicians) and the data analyst were blinded to the group codes. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c and FBS levels from baseline to 12 months. Blood glucose control, nutritional behaviors, and constructs of the model were measured pre-intervention and at 2, 6, and 12 months' follow-up.
resultsRegarding the primary behavioral and nutritional outcomes, the Collaborative Care Model (CCM) demonstrated superior effectiveness. It produced the highest scores in patient attitude (40.17, p < 0.01) and enabling factors (12.07, p < 0.01), and led to the most substantial reduction in saturated fat intake (65% decrease, p < 0.01) over the 12-month period. For biochemical outcomes, all three intervention groups demonstrated statistically significant reductions in FBS and HbA1c compared to the control group at the 12-month follow-up, with the MI group exhibiting the most substantial improvement (p = < 0.001).
conclusionsThese findings suggest that optimal diabetes care may benefit from selecting interventions based on individual patient profiles: CCM for structured continuity, MI for motivational challenges, and FCEM where family support is available. The present findings, may be applicable and useful to improve nutritional behavior and control chronic diseases such as diabetes which is a serious threat to people's health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42236655What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.