ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing educational environments: A sustainable approach through creative design and upcycling applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard of the learning environment has direct and indirect effects on the cognitive performance of the learners and is one of the major elements in the visual identity provided by learning institutions. This study focuses on the development of new designs related to the acoustic, visual, environmental, or infrastructural characteristics of learning spaces that stimulate a positive learning atmosphere among learners, hence contribute towards improved performance. In accordance with the sustainability objectives imposed by the local and international communities, the concept of recycling and or the reuse of waste is incorporated in the learning environment. The proposed solution was applied in the Faculty of Technology and Education by Beni Suef University, through providing an overall intervention based on four principles, including (1) classroom rehabilitation, (2) lobby and administrative rehabilitation, (3) back facade rehabilitation, and (4) front facade rehabilitation. The intervention project was conducted through collaboration between researchers from the fields of architecture, electrical engineering, and art education. Based on the findings, a substantial portion of the recycled materials consisted of solid waste such as cork panels, paper, metals, plastic, and wood. Recycling these materials contributed to reducing environmental impact by avoiding additional carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, user survey feedback reflected positive perceptions, with participants reporting noticeable improvements in the quality of the learning space, a stronger sense of professionalism, and increased awareness of sustainability. Future work will examine scalability across campuses. Universities are encouraged to adopt continuous upcycling programs, standardized waste-management guidelines, and replicable design frameworks that combine aesthetic, environmental, and educational benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.